Skip to main content

Why does Apple think my M1 Pro MacBook Pro is suddenly worth nothing?

With the new M2 Pro MacBook Pros finally official, it's a great upgrade for anyone moving on from an Intel Mac. However, if you're thinking of trading it in through Apple to knock some of the price off, you might be far worse off than I've found with my M1 Pro MacBook Pro.

While I'm holding off for an M3 Pro MacBook Pro, curiosity made me check on Apple's site about how much my current Mac would be worth to trade in. I paid $2399 / £2199 / AU$2799 for it back in October 2021, and I'm still planning to own one until 2025. It's a powerful machine, and I want to get my money's worth.

Yet I look at Apple's trade-in value for it and wonder what the thought process was to come up with an amount of £850 / $900 / AU$943 for my Mac.

A deal that Del Boy would approve of

MacBook Pro 14-inch trade in value

(Image credit: TechRadar)

Price depreciation, where something loses value over time, is a normal, everyday fact of buying something. The car my wife owns will lose some of its value over time, and the same goes for my iPhone 13 Pro, and even some smart lightbulbs I have installed across our home.

Everything gets replaced by something new eventually, and it further drives down the cost of what currently exists. Yet there's a limit to this without it becoming ridiculous, and it seems to me as though Apple's trade-in methods are a shining example of what not to do.

Apple's M-series chips are still fairly new since they were announced at its developer conference WWDC back in June 2020. It's been less than three years, and there are still products such as the Mac Studio that house the M1 Max and M1 Ultra chip - these are essentially more powerful variations of the M1 Pro.

But now, the M1 Pro is nowhere to be seen on Apple's site - just the original M1, the M1 Max, and the M1 Ultra - alongside the new M2, M2 Pro, and M2 Max. Even so, there's no reason why my MacBook Pro should be worth £1300 less in the space of just 15 months.

See more

Others on Twitter are also looking at their trade-in prices, such as the above tweet where user @DurvidImel noted that the Intel Mac Pro has dropped 50 times its value in only three years. Granted, it's an Intel model, but it feels even more ridiculous that the trade-in value is in the hundreds here - and is only roughly $100 more than my M1 MacBook Pro.

Do better, Apple - if you say you're leading the way in helping the environment, especially when it comes to the disposal of old devices, an excessive drop in value when trading these in is not going to be a success.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The latest Apple TV 4K test lets you watch four sports streams at once

Apple is trying something new with the latest beta version of tvOS 16.5: the option to watch up to four simultaneous streams at once. Right now it's limited to live sports streamed through the Apple TV app on the Apple TV 4K , specifically MLB Friday Night Baseball and the MLS Season Pass. A multi-view option was spotted in the tvOS software last month, but the code was hidden and not enabled. MacRumors reported that the feature would be enabled this weekend, and beta testers have since been able to use it. As yet multi-view hasn't been officially announced by Apple, but it's expected that tvOS 16.5 is going to be pushed out in its final form within the next month or so. WWDC 2023 is around the corner as well, when we should be hearing about the next major updates for Apple's various operating systems – including tvOS 17. How it works Over at 9to5Mac there's a hands-on demonstrating how the multi-view feature works, and it's pretty much as you would expe...

Quantum computers are fast becoming cheaper and smaller — and they could be coming to a data center near you very soon

IonQ claims we’re closer to widespread enterprise quantum computing deployment as it lifted the lid on two rack-mounted models that can be deployed on-premises.   The startup has built the fourth-generation #AQ35 IonQ Forte Enterprise and fifth-generation #AQ64 IonQ Tempo, both of which are designed to be deployed in enterprise and government data centers. It’s also said it is deploying two quantum computers to the US Air Force.  While revealing these two models, IonQ co-founder and CTO Jungsang Kim said quantum computers are already in use by enterprises to churn through machine learning workloads. This, he added, suggests we’re much closer to readily available and affordable machines. Priming enterprises for a quantum future “We believe in the enterprise-grade quantum computing, which is where it can be something of value for enterprises, can happen in the next few years as we build powerful enough quantum computers that can actually do things that classical computers w...

Nvidia RTX 4080 GPU could get cheaper with a new version – but don’t get your hopes up

Nvidia’s RTX 4080 is purportedly getting a new spin on the GPU which could reduce the cost, but any price reduction will likely be very minor, sadly, if it happens at all. Tom’s Hardware flagged up this rumor – and treat it with caution, as with anything from the ever-spinning mill – that originated from HKEPC (a tech site in Hong Kong), claiming that while the current RTX 4080 graphics card is built on the AD103-300 chip, Nvidia is going to use a slightly different GPU in the future, namely AD103-301. There’s now more evidence this is actually happening, Tom’s points out, courtesy of a graphics card maker, Galax, which under its RTX 4080 product details lists the GPU as ‘AD103-300/301’. Furthermore, VideoCardz , which also picked up on this, informs us that Gainward, another card maker, has also listed the updated GPU variant AD103-301 in its product specs. With two separate third-party graphics card makers mentioning this new spin on the GPU in their specs, it seems pret...